1
00:00:00,520 --> 00:00:05,960
oh she destroyed the lives of whole

2
00:00:03,080 --> 00:00:08,719
communities that I represented and was

3
00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:11,840
close to I was an honorary member of the

4
00:00:08,719 --> 00:00:14,280
Mine Workers Union as far back as 1983

5
00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:16,840
she totally destroyed the lives of a

6
00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:18,880
million people in the other people on

7
00:00:16,840 --> 00:00:21,960
the left who say well I can't respect

8
00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:23,640
her for what she did uh in economic

9
00:00:21,960 --> 00:00:25,640
terms I can respect her for being the

10
00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:27,840
first woman who broke that glass ceiling

11
00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:29,560
who became uh prime minister of this

12
00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:31,840
country can you respect that how did it

13
00:00:29,560 --> 00:00:35,160
profit us to have a woman as prime

14
00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:37,680
minister when she acted as the most

15
00:00:35,160 --> 00:00:40,320
wicked man might have acted she did

16
00:00:37,680 --> 00:00:43,280
nothing for women in politics Barbara

17
00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:45,480
Castle the labor woman leader the best

18
00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:48,440
woman prime minister we never had that

19
00:00:45,480 --> 00:00:49,920
would have been a real smashing of the

20
00:00:48,440 --> 00:00:53,239
not Margaret thater you can't even

21
00:00:49,920 --> 00:00:56,480
respect a frail 87y old woman who dies

22
00:00:53,239 --> 00:00:59,719
like any other 87y old woman me please

23
00:00:56,480 --> 00:01:01,519
Adam that sanctimony Sky News BBC and

24
00:00:59,719 --> 00:01:04,439
the rest were dancing on the grave of

25
00:01:01,519 --> 00:01:05,479
Hugo Chavez just a few weeks ago a big

26
00:01:04,439 --> 00:01:07,320
public

27
00:01:05,479 --> 00:01:09,520
figure I don't think we danc on his

28
00:01:07,320 --> 00:01:12,799
grave once you did you did and I watched

29
00:01:09,520 --> 00:01:15,840
covered his death no but you covered a a

30
00:01:12,799 --> 00:01:17,600
a wave of attacks and name calling

31
00:01:15,840 --> 00:01:19,479
against him well as we've done with

32
00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:21,520
thater well but you're well that's why

33
00:01:19,479 --> 00:01:23,159
you're here I mean well I'm here but she

34
00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:24,479
died a week ago and it's the first time

35
00:01:23,159 --> 00:01:26,479
I've been here you haven't called me in

36
00:01:24,479 --> 00:01:28,880
a week which is quite unusual but that's

37
00:01:26,479 --> 00:01:32,320
up to you I have other means of getting

38
00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:35,720
my point of view across my point is that

39
00:01:32,320 --> 00:01:38,000
she did not respect the lives of the

40
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:39,640
people whose communities she destroyed

41
00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:41,920
and I don't respect her and it would be

42
00:01:39,640 --> 00:01:43,880
hypocrisy to pretend to do so but you're

43
00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:45,920
trying to stop other people respecting

44
00:01:43,880 --> 00:01:48,200
her as well you're entitled to your view

45
00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:49,560
trying to have prime minister's I mean

46
00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:51,399
why did they have the funeral to clash

47
00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:52,719
with prime minister's questions couldn't

48
00:01:51,399 --> 00:01:54,560
I mean the state organized it why

49
00:01:52,719 --> 00:01:56,320
couldn't it have had it on Tuesday or On

50
00:01:54,560 --> 00:01:58,439
th I believe cricketer is having a

51
00:01:56,320 --> 00:02:01,680
funeral in some pools today Christopher

52
00:01:58,439 --> 00:02:03,680
Martin Jenkins of a block having on

53
00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:05,240
Monday or Tuesday bed blocking but it

54
00:02:03,680 --> 00:02:07,320
could have been on Thursday it could

55
00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:09,679
have been later in the day on Wednesday

56
00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:13,680
there's no reason for Parliament to be

57
00:02:09,679 --> 00:02:16,280
further disrupted by uh this motion and

58
00:02:13,680 --> 00:02:18,400
so I shall oppose it and if there's a

59
00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:20,519
debate tomorrow if I have to speak for

60
00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:22,599
the whole 3 hours myself as you very

61
00:02:20,519 --> 00:02:24,560
well know I'm capable of doing so and I

62
00:02:22,599 --> 00:02:26,000
shall okay George gway thank you very

63
00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:29,800
much indeed I should have said a cricet

64
00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:29,800
commentator I apologize