1 00:00:02,620 --> 00:00:09,330 [Music] 2 00:00:14,040 --> 00:00:18,360 Okay. I can't 3 00:00:30,270 --> 00:00:33,329 [Music] 4 00:00:36,079 --> 00:00:41,040 Welcome to Sputnik orbiting the world 5 00:00:38,239 --> 00:00:43,200 with me George Galloway and me Gayatri. 6 00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:45,360 Few Labour MPs have been loyal to their 7 00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:48,160 leader Jeremy Corbin and even some of 8 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:50,399 his shadow cabinet are far from steady. 9 00:00:48,160 --> 00:00:52,079 Only this week several shadow cabinet 10 00:00:50,399 --> 00:00:54,480 members told the Guardian that they 11 00:00:52,079 --> 00:00:56,960 wanted to change the party's line and 12 00:00:54,480 --> 00:00:59,120 block the triggering of Article 50 and 13 00:00:56,960 --> 00:01:02,320 block Brexit. At the time of writing, 14 00:00:59,120 --> 00:01:04,479 these new inner circle rebels, said to 15 00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:07,200 include, at least by the Guardian, his 16 00:01:04,479 --> 00:01:09,360 closest colleagues, are still in post, 17 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:11,040 despite telling a national newspaper 18 00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:14,080 that they think their boss has got it 19 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:16,880 wrong again. From my own observations, 20 00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:18,960 Corbin's only sound person in the shadow 21 00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:21,520 cabinet is the shadow secretary of state 22 00:01:18,960 --> 00:01:24,000 for justice, Richard Bergen. Sometimes 23 00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:26,320 spoken of himself as a future Labor 24 00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:29,600 leader. I'm glad to say he joins us now. 25 00:01:26,320 --> 00:01:32,720 But before that, Guyatri took her red 26 00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:34,560 gloves onto the streets of London to ask 27 00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:37,280 the public what they thought of how 28 00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:38,880 Jeremy was doing. Oh, it's a difficult 29 00:01:37,280 --> 00:01:41,840 one. You know, I really I I really 30 00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:43,439 struggle to, you know, I just think that 31 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:44,720 you just don't hear from Corbyn. And you 32 00:01:43,439 --> 00:01:47,439 don't hear from Corbyn enough. And as 33 00:01:44,720 --> 00:01:48,640 the leader of the opposition, you know, 34 00:01:47,439 --> 00:01:50,399 where is he? And I know there's lots of 35 00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:52,799 criticism that that's about the media 36 00:01:50,399 --> 00:01:54,320 and that's about the media not being 37 00:01:52,799 --> 00:01:56,479 particularly interested in him or him 38 00:01:54,320 --> 00:01:59,759 being a charact well not a character but 39 00:01:56,479 --> 00:02:03,040 him being a perhaps um not terribly 40 00:01:59,759 --> 00:02:05,119 interesting or charismatic. I think um 41 00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:07,840 all of the policies that he's saying and 42 00:02:05,119 --> 00:02:09,599 he's going to say are definitely down my 43 00:02:07,840 --> 00:02:12,560 street. I think they're all everything I 44 00:02:09,599 --> 00:02:14,959 agree with. Uh the issue is does he come 45 00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:17,200 across as a leader? Uh, is his 46 00:02:14,959 --> 00:02:19,120 personality strong enough against say 47 00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:21,840 Theresa May, something like that? 48 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:24,160 Possibly not. And I think he needs to 49 00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:25,920 kind of build that. Politics at the 50 00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:28,400 moment is a popularity contest, so he 51 00:02:25,920 --> 00:02:31,360 needs to kind of win the the popular 52 00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:34,800 vote in that sense. I think he's a hard 53 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:36,640 person to follow, but I think he's a 54 00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:39,200 genuine person, if that makes sense. 55 00:02:36,640 --> 00:02:40,319 Yeah, absolutely. So, while I think he's 56 00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:41,840 genuine, I don't think he'll ever get 57 00:02:40,319 --> 00:02:43,920 elected because he doesn't have a lot of 58 00:02:41,840 --> 00:02:48,080 leadership characteristics. 59 00:02:43,920 --> 00:02:49,680 Somewhat maligned, but uh I don't 60 00:02:48,080 --> 00:02:51,480 personally 61 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:54,720 uh like him 62 00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:57,480 particularly, and I don't think he's 63 00:02:54,720 --> 00:03:00,080 going to lead the Labor Party to great 64 00:02:57,480 --> 00:03:03,840 success, but I don't think he's much 65 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:06,159 worse than their previous leaders. 66 00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:08,959 Well, there you go. Not much worse than 67 00:03:06,159 --> 00:03:11,599 Ed Milliband. Not exactly high praise. 68 00:03:08,959 --> 00:03:16,879 Now we have some clue as to how this 69 00:03:11,599 --> 00:03:22,080 situation comes about in the BBC trust 70 00:03:16,879 --> 00:03:25,680 condemning Laura Kunberg for inaccuracy 71 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:28,239 and for misleading. Uh and this of 72 00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:30,799 course is a tiny criticism of a giant 73 00:03:28,239 --> 00:03:33,319 problem. The London School of Economics 74 00:03:30,799 --> 00:03:36,720 survey shows that 75 00:03:33,319 --> 00:03:39,760 75% of the media coverage of Jeremy 76 00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:42,080 Corbin is willfully mis I say willfully 77 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:44,000 misleading and definitely completely 78 00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:46,400 inaccurate. How's he going to tackle 79 00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:49,120 that? Well, it's no surprise that the 80 00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:52,159 media establishment or much of it are 81 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:54,319 setting out to demonize Jeremy Corbyn, 82 00:03:52,159 --> 00:03:56,480 not because he is Jeremy Corbyn, but 83 00:03:54,319 --> 00:03:58,400 because he's standing for socialist 84 00:03:56,480 --> 00:04:00,400 politics. And anybody who goes against 85 00:03:58,400 --> 00:04:02,000 the establishment interests will face 86 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:03,680 the eye of the Westminster 87 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:05,680 establishment, the establishment in the 88 00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:08,159 media and establishment elsewhere. But 89 00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:11,840 what Jeremy Corbyn has now got to do and 90 00:04:08,159 --> 00:04:14,400 what I believe he can do is articulate a 91 00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:16,639 populist breadand butter socialist 92 00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:18,720 politics which talks about raising the 93 00:04:16,639 --> 00:04:20,560 living standards of the lower earners, 94 00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:22,560 the middle earners, and even some who 95 00:04:20,560 --> 00:04:24,680 consider themselves to be relatively 96 00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:29,360 well off as well. 97 00:04:24,680 --> 00:04:32,639 Trump faced uh almost complete more than 98 00:04:29,360 --> 00:04:36,400 75% opposition in the US media and he 99 00:04:32,639 --> 00:04:39,440 won and he did that by going around the 100 00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:42,800 media in fact sthing through them uh on 101 00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:45,440 on occasion. Is there something in that 102 00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:47,479 lesson that Jeremy Corbin can take? 103 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:50,840 There's not much you can do about the 104 00:04:47,479 --> 00:04:53,479 privatelyowned media, but the BBC, it's 105 00:04:50,840 --> 00:04:56,400 unconscionable that the BBC, a state 106 00:04:53,479 --> 00:04:58,720 broadcaster paid for by the public on 107 00:04:56,400 --> 00:05:02,800 pain of imprisonment, uh should be 108 00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:05,680 allowed to willfully misrepresent and uh 109 00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:07,680 completely inaccurately report on the 110 00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:09,440 leader of her majesty's opposition. 111 00:05:07,680 --> 00:05:12,240 What's regrettable is that many of the 112 00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:15,039 news outlets rather than seeking as they 113 00:05:12,240 --> 00:05:17,440 should do including the BBC to report 114 00:05:15,039 --> 00:05:20,320 the news are trying to create the news. 115 00:05:17,440 --> 00:05:22,639 Uh and this leads not to proper scrutiny 116 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:26,320 of politicians, not to proper serious 117 00:05:22,639 --> 00:05:28,639 discussion of policy but uh news uh 118 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:30,720 reporters and interviewers trying to 119 00:05:28,639 --> 00:05:32,320 trap a politician into saying this or 120 00:05:30,720 --> 00:05:33,520 saying that, saying they don't agree 121 00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:34,800 with a colleague on this, saying they 122 00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:36,960 don't agree with a colleague on that. 123 00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:38,880 And the newspapers and the media should 124 00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:40,240 realize they're there to report the 125 00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:42,479 news. They're not there to create the 126 00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:45,199 news or or be the news. What I do 127 00:05:42,479 --> 00:05:47,600 differentiate uh is between uh some 128 00:05:45,199 --> 00:05:48,960 reporters and other reporters like 129 00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:51,120 Andrew Neil for example. What I would 130 00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:53,360 say about Andrew Neil is whatever his 131 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:55,280 private politics are, he gives everyone 132 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:57,680 a hard time and that's fair enough. But 133 00:05:55,280 --> 00:05:59,600 what we don't want is uh some people in 134 00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:01,280 the media choosing only to give the 135 00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:02,800 leader of one political party a hard 136 00:06:01,280 --> 00:06:05,360 time. Quite sure. So the other side of 137 00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:08,240 media is this investigative journalism 138 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:11,360 of Al Jazera that you know revealed this 139 00:06:08,240 --> 00:06:14,000 basically a plot yeah a plot by a 140 00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:16,639 foreign power into the Labor party but 141 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:19,840 that's another disgrace. It was a very 142 00:06:16,639 --> 00:06:21,280 interesting uh program indeed. And I 143 00:06:19,840 --> 00:06:23,199 think perhaps the most disturbing part 144 00:06:21,280 --> 00:06:25,120 of the program was where a decent 145 00:06:23,199 --> 00:06:28,000 ordinary Labour party member called 146 00:06:25,120 --> 00:06:31,199 Jean. It didn't show her surname. Um she 147 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:34,080 was shown really uh being in my view 148 00:06:31,199 --> 00:06:37,600 what looked like being fitted up uh for 149 00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:40,160 an untrue allegation of anti-semitism 150 00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:42,160 because the program showed um the 151 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:44,479 incident about which the complaint was 152 00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:47,520 made and the complaint itself. And there 153 00:06:44,479 --> 00:06:50,160 were significant differences between the 154 00:06:47,520 --> 00:06:53,199 incident and the incident as described 155 00:06:50,160 --> 00:06:55,600 in the complaint itself. None of this 156 00:06:53,199 --> 00:06:57,360 would be possible of course, sorry to 157 00:06:55,600 --> 00:07:01,039 press you on this, without the fifth 158 00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:03,599 column that has been operating in your 159 00:07:01,039 --> 00:07:05,919 workplace in parliament. Is there any 160 00:07:03,599 --> 00:07:08,160 sign that that's calming down? I think 161 00:07:05,919 --> 00:07:10,400 most Labor MPs are now getting on with 162 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:11,680 the job they're elected to do, which is 163 00:07:10,400 --> 00:07:13,039 the job of representing their 164 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:14,720 constituents and holding the 165 00:07:13,039 --> 00:07:17,919 Conservative government to account and 166 00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:21,120 standing up for a Labor alternative. In 167 00:07:17,919 --> 00:07:22,960 the past, um, there were real problems, 168 00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:25,440 as you've seen, in people forgetting 169 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:27,360 what they're elected to do, uh, and 170 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:29,919 taking internal Labour Party 171 00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:31,919 disagreements out very publicly and 172 00:07:29,919 --> 00:07:34,080 making it, uh, their business or what 173 00:07:31,919 --> 00:07:35,599 seemed like their life's work to attack 174 00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:37,440 the elected leader of the Labour Party. 175 00:07:35,599 --> 00:07:39,280 I think since the second election of 176 00:07:37,440 --> 00:07:41,759 Jeremy Corbyn, the vast majority of 177 00:07:39,280 --> 00:07:44,720 Labour MPs, virtually all of whom now, 178 00:07:41,759 --> 00:07:46,560 by the way, accept anti- austerity 179 00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:48,400 politics and anti-ostusterity economics, 180 00:07:46,560 --> 00:07:49,919 are now rolling up the sleeves and 181 00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:51,919 getting on with the job they're elected 182 00:07:49,919 --> 00:07:54,160 to do. And that makes Labor and that 183 00:07:51,919 --> 00:07:57,319 makes Jeremy Corbyn stronger. will 184 00:07:54,160 --> 00:08:00,319 accept those that this week uh told the 185 00:07:57,319 --> 00:08:02,080 Guardian and the Guardian says they 186 00:08:00,319 --> 00:08:05,280 might be lying wouldn't be the first 187 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:07,039 time that they included uh some of 188 00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:09,360 Jeremy's closest colleagues in the 189 00:08:07,039 --> 00:08:11,039 shadow cabinet who told the Guardian 190 00:08:09,360 --> 00:08:14,479 that they were trying to change the 191 00:08:11,039 --> 00:08:17,199 party's line on Brexit in advance of a 192 00:08:14,479 --> 00:08:20,160 bi-election in Stoke on Trent against 193 00:08:17,199 --> 00:08:24,240 the leader of UKIP in a constituency 194 00:08:20,160 --> 00:08:26,720 that almost 70% voted Brexit it. Now, 195 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:29,199 I'm glad to say that Corbin seems to 196 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:30,639 have cracked down quite hard on that. 197 00:08:29,199 --> 00:08:33,839 But it's come to something, isn't it? 198 00:08:30,639 --> 00:08:37,519 When when shadow cabinet members who 199 00:08:33,839 --> 00:08:40,560 presumably are the only people in the PL 200 00:08:37,519 --> 00:08:42,959 that ought to be able to be relied upon 201 00:08:40,560 --> 00:08:45,600 uh are briefing the newspapers that 202 00:08:42,959 --> 00:08:48,080 they're trying something so potentially 203 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:51,120 destabilizing as this. Well, I think 204 00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:53,120 people have got to understand that um 205 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:55,440 unconditional worship of the European 206 00:08:53,120 --> 00:08:58,320 Union plus getting involved in 207 00:08:55,440 --> 00:09:00,000 interventionist uh wars doesn't amount 208 00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:02,160 to internationalism. I think some people 209 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:04,480 have made a mistake in all parties on 210 00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:06,959 that uh in the past. But Jeremy's 211 00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:09,440 position on the European Union and the 212 00:09:06,959 --> 00:09:11,760 outcome of the referendum is correct. 213 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:13,600 For me, it's a matter of democratic 214 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:16,080 principle that Britain should leave the 215 00:09:13,600 --> 00:09:19,040 European Union because Britain voted to 216 00:09:16,080 --> 00:09:21,680 leave the European uh union. Uh Jeremy 217 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:24,320 Corbyn has made that clear since 23rd of 218 00:09:21,680 --> 00:09:26,720 June. And to now uh if anyone is 219 00:09:24,320 --> 00:09:28,320 considering a Uturn on that, not only 220 00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:29,680 would it be the morally and 221 00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:32,160 democratically wrong thing to do, it 222 00:09:29,680 --> 00:09:36,240 would also make the Labour party look uh 223 00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:38,720 rather foolish. It is uh a paradox that 224 00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:43,200 those who followed a former leader Tony 225 00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:44,640 Blair most closely and Mr. Blair himself 226 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:48,560 could be described I don't think he 227 00:09:44,640 --> 00:09:51,839 would demar as a euro file a man in love 228 00:09:48,560 --> 00:09:53,360 with the European Union. Yet his closest 229 00:09:51,839 --> 00:09:55,760 followers in parliament are now 230 00:09:53,360 --> 00:09:59,600 attacking Jeremy Corbyn uh from a 231 00:09:55,760 --> 00:10:03,360 euroskeepic position uh visav so-called 232 00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:07,399 free movement of labor which of course 233 00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:10,959 affects working people in uh many 234 00:10:07,399 --> 00:10:13,920 constituencies almost all labor MPs are 235 00:10:10,959 --> 00:10:16,640 sitting in constituencies that voted to 236 00:10:13,920 --> 00:10:19,760 leave the European Union. Is this just 237 00:10:16,640 --> 00:10:22,240 pure opportunism uh on their part or 238 00:10:19,760 --> 00:10:24,800 have they genuinely become persuaded 239 00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:26,480 that the free movement clauses have to 240 00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:30,640 be removed? Well, I think some people 241 00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:32,640 who believe uh in free markets economics 242 00:10:30,640 --> 00:10:35,279 um would not previously accept that 243 00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:38,480 there was any possible problem with the 244 00:10:35,279 --> 00:10:41,279 free movement of labor uh in uh uh 245 00:10:38,480 --> 00:10:44,800 Europe across countries with different 246 00:10:41,279 --> 00:10:47,120 uh levels uh of economy. Uh now I think 247 00:10:44,800 --> 00:10:49,600 electoral reality has hit many people 248 00:10:47,120 --> 00:10:50,959 but also people have heard the accounts 249 00:10:49,600 --> 00:10:53,360 they've heard the accounts of the way 250 00:10:50,959 --> 00:10:55,440 people like Mike Ashley at Sports Direct 251 00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:58,160 have behaved. They've heard accounts for 252 00:10:55,440 --> 00:11:00,880 example of jobs in warehouses in 253 00:10:58,160 --> 00:11:02,959 Yorkshire only being advertised uh in 254 00:11:00,880 --> 00:11:05,519 Eastern uh Europe and it's quite right 255 00:11:02,959 --> 00:11:07,120 that Jeremy Corbyn has spoken out uh 256 00:11:05,519 --> 00:11:09,200 against this. Some people have 257 00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:11,600 criticized him for speaking out against 258 00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:13,519 unscrupulous bosses using the freement 259 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:15,920 of labor in an attempt to drive down 260 00:11:13,519 --> 00:11:18,160 terms and conditions. People who think 261 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:20,959 it's not socialist to say this are quite 262 00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:22,800 wrong. It's not socialist to not say it. 263 00:11:20,959 --> 00:11:27,800 And it's quite right that Jeremy Corbyn 264 00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:29,800 has spoken out about that. Qu uh 265 00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:33,600 lastly, he's not 266 00:11:29,800 --> 00:11:35,440 yet up to the pace. Uh the polls are not 267 00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:38,800 good. Although this week actually there 268 00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:42,959 have been a few glimmers of hope with 269 00:11:38,800 --> 00:11:44,720 this new some call it populist turn. Can 270 00:11:42,959 --> 00:11:46,800 he catch up? Is there enough time to 271 00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:49,120 catch up? Well, I think we've got to see 272 00:11:46,800 --> 00:11:51,519 Labour's position in the polls not about 273 00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:52,800 one individual and not even about the 274 00:11:51,519 --> 00:11:54,160 people in the shadow cabinet or the 275 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:56,000 people in the parliamentary Labor Party. 276 00:11:54,160 --> 00:11:59,600 We have to see it in the political 277 00:11:56,000 --> 00:12:02,000 context across Europe of all socialist 278 00:11:59,600 --> 00:12:03,680 and social democratic parties being in 279 00:12:02,000 --> 00:12:05,920 crisis. In fact, I think there's only 280 00:12:03,680 --> 00:12:09,279 one political party of the left in 281 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:11,360 Europe uh that is ahead of Labor uh in 282 00:12:09,279 --> 00:12:14,000 the polls in their respective uh 283 00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:16,480 countries. So, it's a great challenge 284 00:12:14,000 --> 00:12:19,279 all left of center social and social 285 00:12:16,480 --> 00:12:22,279 democratic parties uh are facing. I 286 00:12:19,279 --> 00:12:24,800 believe Jeremy's arguments, Jeremy's 287 00:12:22,279 --> 00:12:27,440 popularization of breadandbut arguments, 288 00:12:24,800 --> 00:12:29,519 73% of the population agree in taking 289 00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:31,120 the railways back into public ownership. 290 00:12:29,519 --> 00:12:33,440 For example, the majority of the 291 00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:36,720 population agree with this idea of a 292 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:38,720 wage ratio to reduce the grotesque 293 00:12:36,720 --> 00:12:40,959 levels of inequality in our society. I 294 00:12:38,720 --> 00:12:42,639 believe it is possible for us to win at 295 00:12:40,959 --> 00:12:45,200 the next general election, but nobody 296 00:12:42,639 --> 00:12:47,920 said it was going to be easy and it was 297 00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:50,639 never going to be easy. Richard Bergen, 298 00:12:47,920 --> 00:12:53,200 thanks for joining us on the Sputnik. 299 00:12:50,639 --> 00:12:56,639 Coming up after the break is Jeremy 300 00:12:53,200 --> 00:13:00,120 Corbin's sternest critic, John McTurnon. 301 00:12:56,639 --> 00:13:00,120 Don't miss it. 302 00:13:00,590 --> 00:13:04,320 [Music] 303 00:13:01,920 --> 00:13:06,000 Welcome back to Sputnik. Don't say we 304 00:13:04,320 --> 00:13:08,240 don't seek balance on board this 305 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:10,399 spaceship because our next guest is 306 00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:12,639 Jeremy Corbin's most consistent, 307 00:13:10,399 --> 00:13:15,440 prolific, and I'd say most effective 308 00:13:12,639 --> 00:13:17,839 critic. He's John McTurnon, formerly of 309 00:13:15,440 --> 00:13:20,240 my own Scottish parish and former 310 00:13:17,839 --> 00:13:22,480 Downing Street advisor to Tony Blair. 311 00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:24,720 John, thanks for coming back uh on the 312 00:13:22,480 --> 00:13:28,000 Sputnik. Before we turn to Corbin, which 313 00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:31,600 I promise you we shall, uh, let me take 314 00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:35,040 advantage of your Scottish experience. 315 00:13:31,600 --> 00:13:37,440 Here we have now Nicholas Sturgeon more 316 00:13:35,040 --> 00:13:39,760 or less boxing herself into a corner for 317 00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:42,000 another independence referendum. 318 00:13:39,760 --> 00:13:44,959 Otherwise, having marched her people up 319 00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:48,760 the hill twice, she'd have to uh march 320 00:13:44,959 --> 00:13:53,360 herself down again. uh 321 00:13:48,760 --> 00:13:55,200 and pegging the Scottish referendum to 322 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:59,040 the question of the EU. Now, we both 323 00:13:55,200 --> 00:14:01,440 know Scotland well. We know that the EU 324 00:13:59,040 --> 00:14:03,440 is not nearly as popular as Nicholas 325 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:05,600 Sturgeon thinks it is, especially the 326 00:14:03,440 --> 00:14:08,000 issue of free movement. I never met any 327 00:14:05,600 --> 00:14:12,320 Scot that wants all of Bulgaria and 328 00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:14,480 Romania to head for uh for Glasgow. Um 329 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:16,160 why has she done it? I think she's 330 00:14:14,480 --> 00:14:18,320 trapped. She's trapped by two things. 331 00:14:16,160 --> 00:14:20,399 One is her party wanting it and the 332 00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:22,480 other is she's trapped in a way like 333 00:14:20,399 --> 00:14:24,639 most leaders are by their predecessor. 334 00:14:22,480 --> 00:14:26,560 So Salmon got close but didn't get over 335 00:14:24,639 --> 00:14:28,000 the line. So she feels she has to go on 336 00:14:26,560 --> 00:14:31,199 better and have the referendum and get 337 00:14:28,000 --> 00:14:34,240 over the line. Her problem is she has 338 00:14:31,199 --> 00:14:35,839 misinterpreted why they lost. Uh she 339 00:14:34,240 --> 00:14:38,639 looked at Sam and thought he lost the 340 00:14:35,839 --> 00:14:40,560 argument on the pound. Therefore they've 341 00:14:38,639 --> 00:14:42,560 got to have a policy on the pound. 342 00:14:40,560 --> 00:14:44,079 Therefore the European Union works in a 343 00:14:42,560 --> 00:14:46,000 way because it guarantees your currency 344 00:14:44,079 --> 00:14:47,680 the euro eventually. But she's going to 345 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:49,279 find out that the euro is no more 346 00:14:47,680 --> 00:14:50,800 popular in Scotland than it is in 347 00:14:49,279 --> 00:14:52,399 England. She's going to find that the 348 00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:54,959 white working-class voters in Glasgow 349 00:14:52,399 --> 00:14:56,720 and Dundee uh in the schemes in 350 00:14:54,959 --> 00:14:59,120 Edinburgh, they don't want free 351 00:14:56,720 --> 00:15:02,000 movement. They don't want uh to see, you 352 00:14:59,120 --> 00:15:03,199 know, let's leave the UK just at a time 353 00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:05,040 when the UK is going to clamp down 354 00:15:03,199 --> 00:15:06,800 immigration so we can get all the 355 00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:08,720 migrants who want to come from Europe. 356 00:15:06,800 --> 00:15:11,440 It's not the greatest campaign you could 357 00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:13,760 have in the world. No. I mean, uh, I 358 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:16,480 know of no campaign organizer that would 359 00:15:13,760 --> 00:15:19,360 relish that, uh, prospect. So, do you 360 00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:22,800 agree with me that actually it's a 361 00:15:19,360 --> 00:15:24,639 harder cell Scottish independence second 362 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:26,160 time round than it was first? Yeah, I 363 00:15:24,639 --> 00:15:27,519 think so. I mean, I think the oil prices 364 00:15:26,160 --> 00:15:30,079 collapsed, which kind of gives you a big 365 00:15:27,519 --> 00:15:31,760 question mark over the uh the economics. 366 00:15:30,079 --> 00:15:33,360 Um, because the oil price collapsed, 367 00:15:31,760 --> 00:15:36,720 it's very clear how much is transferred 368 00:15:33,360 --> 00:15:38,399 from the UK to Scotland. Uh, it's around 369 00:15:36,720 --> 00:15:41,680 15 billion pounds a year. there's a net 370 00:15:38,399 --> 00:15:42,959 of 10 billion pounds maybe um once you 371 00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:44,240 take into account that you could run a 372 00:15:42,959 --> 00:15:47,440 deficit, you could do you could have 373 00:15:44,240 --> 00:15:50,240 borrowing as a government. Now what 374 00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:53,440 you're going to do uh is effectively say 375 00:15:50,240 --> 00:15:55,519 leave a fiscal union that transfers 10 376 00:15:53,440 --> 00:15:57,600 billion pounds a year to you and join a 377 00:15:55,519 --> 00:15:58,880 customs union that doesn't transfer 378 00:15:57,600 --> 00:16:00,720 anything to you and actually charges you 379 00:15:58,880 --> 00:16:02,399 charges 1 or2 billion pounds a year if 380 00:16:00,720 --> 00:16:04,560 you look at the British contribution 381 00:16:02,399 --> 00:16:06,639 praa. So Scotland would be paying to 382 00:16:04,560 --> 00:16:08,560 join a customs union and losing 10 383 00:16:06,639 --> 00:16:11,279 billion pounds. That is a really hard 384 00:16:08,560 --> 00:16:15,279 sell on top of the euro on top of uh 385 00:16:11,279 --> 00:16:18,160 free movement. And the core argument is 386 00:16:15,279 --> 00:16:19,759 we've got to we've got to leave the 387 00:16:18,160 --> 00:16:22,160 biggest single market that we sell our 388 00:16:19,759 --> 00:16:24,160 goods and services to the UK to join 389 00:16:22,160 --> 00:16:26,000 another single market. So where's the 390 00:16:24,160 --> 00:16:27,199 logic? Where's the driver of all this? 391 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:30,399 Where's the thing that goes the British 392 00:16:27,199 --> 00:16:32,560 single market? They sell four times more 393 00:16:30,399 --> 00:16:35,279 than to the European single market. 394 00:16:32,560 --> 00:16:37,120 Yeah, it's financial services are sold 395 00:16:35,279 --> 00:16:38,560 internally much more than externally. Do 396 00:16:37,120 --> 00:16:40,880 you think the current prime minister 397 00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:42,880 thinks along these lines and actually 398 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:44,480 will grant her this opportunity to just 399 00:16:42,880 --> 00:16:46,320 to teach her a lesson? It's really 400 00:16:44,480 --> 00:16:48,480 interesting. I think that that that um 401 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:50,320 Theresa May has said Scotland had its 402 00:16:48,480 --> 00:16:51,519 referendum. You had the you had the 403 00:16:50,320 --> 00:16:53,279 chance. You had your referendum. You 404 00:16:51,519 --> 00:16:55,600 lost it. And there's part of me that 405 00:16:53,279 --> 00:16:57,839 wonders whether Nicholas Sturgeon is 406 00:16:55,600 --> 00:16:59,600 pushing hard to be stopped. She's like 407 00:16:57,839 --> 00:17:01,440 that guy in the bar that goes for a 408 00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:03,680 fight in hopes that they hold me back. 409 00:17:01,440 --> 00:17:05,120 hold me back that she cuz what she 410 00:17:03,680 --> 00:17:06,559 really wants is not told the referendum 411 00:17:05,120 --> 00:17:08,959 cuz she must understand like you and I 412 00:17:06,559 --> 00:17:11,439 do like we all do that she'd lose it. So 413 00:17:08,959 --> 00:17:12,799 she's trying to have it and wants to not 414 00:17:11,439 --> 00:17:14,799 have not not be allowed to have it. Then 415 00:17:12,799 --> 00:17:16,079 she's got a grievance. It's perfect. You 416 00:17:14,799 --> 00:17:17,360 don't have to have a vote. You lose. But 417 00:17:16,079 --> 00:17:18,799 you've got a grievance. You can say the 418 00:17:17,360 --> 00:17:20,880 English wouldn't let me. Well, given 419 00:17:18,799 --> 00:17:23,439 this is chess, not draft. The sensible 420 00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:26,079 thing for the British state to do is to 421 00:17:23,439 --> 00:17:27,679 say yes, let's have a referendum. And 422 00:17:26,079 --> 00:17:30,799 that's certainly what I'm uh campaigning 423 00:17:27,679 --> 00:17:34,320 for. Let me turn then to Labor Party 424 00:17:30,799 --> 00:17:37,440 matters. You uh from the beginning uh 425 00:17:34,320 --> 00:17:40,880 have been absolutely consistent that 426 00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:44,720 Labor under Jeremy Corbin is going 427 00:17:40,880 --> 00:17:46,559 nowhere uh except downwards uh in the 428 00:17:44,720 --> 00:17:50,080 polls. There's some patchy evidence one 429 00:17:46,559 --> 00:17:52,720 way or another on that point. But uh it 430 00:17:50,080 --> 00:17:54,559 would have to be acknowledged that Labor 431 00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:57,440 has a long way to go before it's in with 432 00:17:54,559 --> 00:17:59,440 a fighting chance uh against this 433 00:17:57,440 --> 00:18:02,799 government. And yet, as you said on this 434 00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:04,720 very sofa a long time ago, there's no 435 00:18:02,799 --> 00:18:06,600 real alternative. There's no alternative 436 00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:08,720 project. There's no alternative 437 00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:12,000 candidate. And therefore, it's a bit of 438 00:18:08,720 --> 00:18:15,080 a irresistible force, immovable object. 439 00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:19,679 And what's the result of that? 440 00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:22,000 So, it's clear uh if it wasn't before 441 00:18:19,679 --> 00:18:24,559 that the Corbin project is to purify the 442 00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:26,960 Labor Party. Uh like many on the far 443 00:18:24,559 --> 00:18:29,679 left, his real anger is not at the 444 00:18:26,960 --> 00:18:31,600 Tories. His anger is at uh moderates 445 00:18:29,679 --> 00:18:32,799 inside the Labor Party. That's where 446 00:18:31,600 --> 00:18:34,559 that's who that's the people who get the 447 00:18:32,799 --> 00:18:36,320 real abuse, the real venom. That's the 448 00:18:34,559 --> 00:18:37,840 people who get told that they're Tories. 449 00:18:36,320 --> 00:18:39,280 And if you think about it logically, and 450 00:18:37,840 --> 00:18:40,799 I said this at Labor Party conference at 451 00:18:39,280 --> 00:18:43,120 various fringe meetings, you know, I'm 452 00:18:40,799 --> 00:18:44,640 not a Tory. I said that and some people 453 00:18:43,120 --> 00:18:46,480 in the audience booed at me and shout 454 00:18:44,640 --> 00:18:48,320 said I wasn't. It's like seriously if 455 00:18:46,480 --> 00:18:50,320 you call me a Tory. What do you say to a 456 00:18:48,320 --> 00:18:52,320 Labour voter in Stoke or in Copeland 457 00:18:50,320 --> 00:18:54,080 who's thinking of voting Tory or UKIP? 458 00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:56,080 You don't win somebody back now. I'm a 459 00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:58,320 Labor party member. I'm not a Tory. But 460 00:18:56,080 --> 00:18:59,760 once but you're trying to purge me. Once 461 00:18:58,320 --> 00:19:01,360 you purge and purify the party, what 462 00:18:59,760 --> 00:19:03,039 have you got left? 20% of the vote. 463 00:19:01,360 --> 00:19:05,280 Maybe that's the core. You can't push 464 00:19:03,039 --> 00:19:06,480 Labor down below. And that that is a 465 00:19:05,280 --> 00:19:08,080 that's the problem with the Corbin 466 00:19:06,480 --> 00:19:09,520 project. It's a project always about 467 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:11,440 maintaining control over the Labor 468 00:19:09,520 --> 00:19:14,000 Party. It's not a project for winning 469 00:19:11,440 --> 00:19:15,919 power in the country. And the tragedy is 470 00:19:14,000 --> 00:19:17,440 there isn't an alternative project uh as 471 00:19:15,919 --> 00:19:20,480 I said to you before within the Labor 472 00:19:17,440 --> 00:19:23,360 Party. And yet any politician who is 473 00:19:20,480 --> 00:19:25,679 able to say I can I've got a program for 474 00:19:23,360 --> 00:19:28,000 building houses and enabling younger 475 00:19:25,679 --> 00:19:29,840 workers to buy them. I've got a program 476 00:19:28,000 --> 00:19:31,120 for enabling today's workers to have 477 00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:33,360 build up a decent pension for 478 00:19:31,120 --> 00:19:35,360 retirement. And I've got a program for 479 00:19:33,360 --> 00:19:37,600 social care fully funded to ensure that 480 00:19:35,360 --> 00:19:39,039 our older people can live in dignity uh 481 00:19:37,600 --> 00:19:41,039 with independence, not to have to stay 482 00:19:39,039 --> 00:19:43,120 in hospital. can be at home, they can be 483 00:19:41,039 --> 00:19:44,799 supported properly with social care. Um, 484 00:19:43,120 --> 00:19:46,799 if you had that program of housing of 485 00:19:44,799 --> 00:19:48,640 pensions of social care, you could sweep 486 00:19:46,799 --> 00:19:50,000 the board because the Tories don't have 487 00:19:48,640 --> 00:19:51,600 that program. The Liberal Democrats 488 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:53,360 don't have that program. Labor don't 489 00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:55,440 have it. So, it's the ideal kind of 490 00:19:53,360 --> 00:19:57,600 middle ground, uh, middle England, 491 00:19:55,440 --> 00:20:00,480 middle Scotland, middle Wales type 492 00:19:57,600 --> 00:20:01,440 middle class appeal. Um, but goodness 493 00:20:00,480 --> 00:20:02,960 knows where all the thinking in the 494 00:20:01,440 --> 00:20:04,400 Labor Party is actually gone. But it's 495 00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:05,760 not being expressed on the backbenches. 496 00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:08,160 It's not being expressed in the think 497 00:20:05,760 --> 00:20:09,919 tanks. You say that, John, but actually 498 00:20:08,160 --> 00:20:11,919 there's not a lot of evidence that he's 499 00:20:09,919 --> 00:20:13,440 doing much purifying. He certainly 500 00:20:11,919 --> 00:20:15,360 hasn't brought me back. He hasn't 501 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:18,720 brought Ken Livingston back. He hasn't 502 00:20:15,360 --> 00:20:22,400 done partly because he can't uh anything 503 00:20:18,720 --> 00:20:25,440 about uh deselections or reelections 504 00:20:22,400 --> 00:20:27,679 uh or anything uh like that isn't a 505 00:20:25,440 --> 00:20:30,880 bigger problem. You you identify this as 506 00:20:27,679 --> 00:20:33,039 a problem. isn't a bigger problem that 507 00:20:30,880 --> 00:20:36,080 he's neither one thing nor the other and 508 00:20:33,039 --> 00:20:39,120 maybe can't be one thing or the other. 509 00:20:36,080 --> 00:20:42,240 Not able to reach out, not able to uh 510 00:20:39,120 --> 00:20:43,840 remodel the the Labor Party itself. 511 00:20:42,240 --> 00:20:45,200 Look, I think the I think the relaunch 512 00:20:43,840 --> 00:20:47,440 was really interesting. The relaunch of 513 00:20:45,200 --> 00:20:50,600 Corbin was interesting. Uh the idea was 514 00:20:47,440 --> 00:20:53,919 let Corbin be Corbin. 515 00:20:50,600 --> 00:20:56,320 Now, to be honest, that's all he's got. 516 00:20:53,919 --> 00:20:58,159 His attraction to the new the new 517 00:20:56,320 --> 00:20:59,919 members of the Labour party, the large 518 00:20:58,159 --> 00:21:02,480 uh influx of new members. His attraction 519 00:20:59,919 --> 00:21:04,919 to them is not a politician like all the 520 00:21:02,480 --> 00:21:06,880 rest. Uh his attraction is his 521 00:21:04,919 --> 00:21:08,400 authenticity. His attraction is that 522 00:21:06,880 --> 00:21:10,640 he's not the he's not a polished 523 00:21:08,400 --> 00:21:14,480 performer. He's beyond spin in some way. 524 00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:16,880 He's kind of uh and and that if you 525 00:21:14,480 --> 00:21:18,000 wanted to promote him would probably 526 00:21:16,880 --> 00:21:20,000 what you'd have to focus on. You have to 527 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:22,799 say he's not like all the rest. But when 528 00:21:20,000 --> 00:21:24,480 he relaunched, he didn't talk about 529 00:21:22,799 --> 00:21:26,159 immigration, though he briefed he was 530 00:21:24,480 --> 00:21:28,400 going to talk about immigration and free 531 00:21:26,159 --> 00:21:31,039 movement. He then thought up a new 532 00:21:28,400 --> 00:21:32,400 policy about wage caps. By the middle of 533 00:21:31,039 --> 00:21:34,000 the day, he was going, "Yeah, probably 534 00:21:32,400 --> 00:21:35,600 footballers are paid too much." By the 535 00:21:34,000 --> 00:21:37,480 end of the day, he thought that might be 536 00:21:35,600 --> 00:21:40,320 unpopular, so he stopped saying it. 537 00:21:37,480 --> 00:21:43,039 Well, I think, and you probably think, 538 00:21:40,320 --> 00:21:45,200 too, he's in favor of capping wages. 539 00:21:43,039 --> 00:21:47,120 Well, why not say that? And if people 540 00:21:45,200 --> 00:21:48,880 ask you how you do it, you say, "Let us 541 00:21:47,120 --> 00:21:50,880 into government and we'll do it." and 542 00:21:48,880 --> 00:21:52,559 you ride a tide of populist outrage. You 543 00:21:50,880 --> 00:21:54,799 do a Trumpian thing. You go, "They're 544 00:21:52,559 --> 00:21:56,080 paid too much. I'll stop it." Trump's 545 00:21:54,799 --> 00:21:57,440 never given any detail about how he's 546 00:21:56,080 --> 00:21:59,440 going to do stuff. Just says it'll 547 00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:02,400 happen. But the Corbin thing, he he's 548 00:21:59,440 --> 00:22:04,960 caught in a no man's land between being 549 00:22:02,400 --> 00:22:08,960 prepared for interviews uh and being 550 00:22:04,960 --> 00:22:11,039 himself. Uh and I think maybe Corbin 551 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:13,520 can't be Corbin because the thing he 552 00:22:11,039 --> 00:22:15,679 really is is an oppositionalist. He's 553 00:22:13,520 --> 00:22:17,600 happy in small groups and small group 554 00:22:15,679 --> 00:22:20,480 hustles. He's happy being against the 555 00:22:17,600 --> 00:22:23,039 leadership. He's kind of he'd be happier 556 00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:25,679 campaigning against himself than he is 557 00:22:23,039 --> 00:22:27,440 being himself. Um because the the 558 00:22:25,679 --> 00:22:29,600 leadership doesn't sit doesn't sit well 559 00:22:27,440 --> 00:22:32,960 with him. Now, I can't have you here 560 00:22:29,600 --> 00:22:35,600 without uh mentioning uh uh uh your 561 00:22:32,960 --> 00:22:39,360 friend and my enemy Tony Blair. He's 562 00:22:35,600 --> 00:22:43,960 coming back into politics. Got a big uh 563 00:22:39,360 --> 00:22:46,159 war chest 10 million pounds. we read uh 564 00:22:43,960 --> 00:22:49,280 paradoxically he's really fighting the 565 00:22:46,159 --> 00:22:53,520 Brexit just as some of his supporters 566 00:22:49,280 --> 00:22:55,840 are cottoning on one imagines genuinely 567 00:22:53,520 --> 00:22:57,720 that actually many aspects of the EU are 568 00:22:55,840 --> 00:23:00,080 really unpopular in their own 569 00:22:57,720 --> 00:23:02,799 constituencies how's that going to work 570 00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:05,840 uh Tony Blair saying we should stay in 571 00:23:02,799 --> 00:23:08,400 the single market and by implication 572 00:23:05,840 --> 00:23:10,960 keep free movement whilst the Blair 573 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:12,960 rights uh are discovering ing that 574 00:23:10,960 --> 00:23:16,559 actually free movement is what done for 575 00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:18,880 the EU in Britain. Well, I mean, in the 576 00:23:16,559 --> 00:23:20,799 end, as you know, the historic role of 577 00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:24,000 social democracy has always been to save 578 00:23:20,799 --> 00:23:25,760 capitalism from itself. Now, in the face 579 00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:28,640 of Brexit, which is the most profoundly 580 00:23:25,760 --> 00:23:30,480 anti- capitalist move that um uh a Tory 581 00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:32,320 party's ever made, you know, Margaret 582 00:23:30,480 --> 00:23:33,679 Thatcher's greatest achievement in 583 00:23:32,320 --> 00:23:36,880 economics was the single European 584 00:23:33,679 --> 00:23:39,200 market. And now, um uh Theresa May wants 585 00:23:36,880 --> 00:23:41,919 to wants to pull pull pull out of that. 586 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:43,520 So you've got a situation where the 587 00:23:41,919 --> 00:23:46,159 banks, hospitality industry, 588 00:23:43,520 --> 00:23:48,960 agriculture, farming, huge industries in 589 00:23:46,159 --> 00:23:50,559 Britain, manufacturing as well, all need 590 00:23:48,960 --> 00:23:52,159 to be in the single market, all need the 591 00:23:50,559 --> 00:23:54,080 free movement of labor that's available 592 00:23:52,159 --> 00:23:56,000 through the single market. And the Tory 593 00:23:54,080 --> 00:23:57,919 party set their face against it. So in a 594 00:23:56,000 --> 00:24:01,120 funny kind of way, Tony Blair not only 595 00:23:57,919 --> 00:24:02,880 wants to speak up for those in the 596 00:24:01,120 --> 00:24:04,480 country who are remainers who want the 597 00:24:02,880 --> 00:24:06,799 voice, he's actually the only person 598 00:24:04,480 --> 00:24:09,840 speaking up for capitalism within the 599 00:24:06,799 --> 00:24:12,480 UK. Um, and you know, my hope in the 600 00:24:09,840 --> 00:24:14,640 end, uh, is that if anybody can rescue 601 00:24:12,480 --> 00:24:16,640 the UK and the Labor Party, it will be 602 00:24:14,640 --> 00:24:17,760 International Finance Capital because 603 00:24:16,640 --> 00:24:20,640 it's got to stand up for itself 604 00:24:17,760 --> 00:24:22,320 somewhere somehow, hasn't it? As Mrs. 605 00:24:20,640 --> 00:24:24,159 Thatcho once said, it's a funny old 606 00:24:22,320 --> 00:24:26,640 world. It's a funny old world and it 607 00:24:24,159 --> 00:24:28,880 would be a funny old Labor Party and a 608 00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:30,640 funny old capitalist system in those 609 00:24:28,880 --> 00:24:32,320 circumstances. John McTurnon, always a 610 00:24:30,640 --> 00:24:34,470 pleasure to talk to you. Thanks for 611 00:24:32,320 --> 00:24:37,120 joining us on the Sputnik. 612 00:24:34,470 --> 00:24:38,799 [Music] 613 00:24:37,120 --> 00:24:40,799 And now it's your turn to tell us what 614 00:24:38,799 --> 00:24:43,760 you think through the portals of social 615 00:24:40,799 --> 00:24:46,240 media. What's rattling guy? So this week 616 00:24:43,760 --> 00:24:48,559 we asked uh what Jeremy could and should 617 00:24:46,240 --> 00:24:51,880 do in the face of this biased and 618 00:24:48,559 --> 00:24:54,720 willfully inaccurate media. Arthur 619 00:24:51,880 --> 00:24:56,720 Cherrostovski says commanding Europe's 620 00:24:54,720 --> 00:24:59,679 largest progressive party, he's 621 00:24:56,720 --> 00:25:02,559 virtually powerless. Whereas Scotty 500 622 00:24:59,679 --> 00:25:05,520 says learn from Donald Trump. Take to 623 00:25:02,559 --> 00:25:07,440 Twitter. And John McCormack says, "Well, 624 00:25:05,520 --> 00:25:10,640 what Arnold Schwarzenegger would do, 625 00:25:07,440 --> 00:25:13,279 strike back." That's all very good. Uh 626 00:25:10,640 --> 00:25:15,120 he he does have to do that. Uh we're not 627 00:25:13,279 --> 00:25:20,000 going to get fairness in the British 628 00:25:15,120 --> 00:25:22,720 media. No. Uh but uh did Trump win the 629 00:25:20,000 --> 00:25:25,279 election on Twitter and on Facebook and 630 00:25:22,720 --> 00:25:27,039 on his own? The answer to that is yes. 631 00:25:25,279 --> 00:25:28,799 And that's all the time we have for the 632 00:25:27,039 --> 00:25:30,640 tweets this week, which alas means 633 00:25:28,799 --> 00:25:32,480 that's the end of the show, but you can 634 00:25:30,640 --> 00:25:35,679 stay in touch with us on Twitter and now 635 00:25:32,480 --> 00:25:37,679 on Instagram, RT Sputnik, or Facebook. 636 00:25:35,679 --> 00:25:39,760 Sputnik on Russia Today. It's goodbye 637 00:25:37,679 --> 00:25:44,200 from me, Gayatri. And from me, George 638 00:25:39,760 --> 00:25:44,200 Galloway. It's been marvelous. 639 00:25:53,730 --> 00:25:57,130 [Music]